Agenda setting theory

in Communication Theory

Agenda setting theory (Maxwell McCombs and Donald L. Shaw)

Media influence affects the order of presentation in news reports about news events, issues in the public mind. More importance to a news-more importance attributed by audience. Media Priorities It says what people should think about and how people should think about.

These are the levels of agenda setting theory:

First Level:

Mostly studied by researchers, media uses objects or issues to influence the people what people should think about.

Second level:

Media focuses on the characters of issues how people should think about.

Agenda setting theory used in political ad, campaigns, business news, PR (public relation) etc.

The main concept associated with the agenda setting theory is gate keeping. Gate keeping controls over the selection of content discussed in the media; Public cares mostly about the product of a media gate keeping. It is especially editors media itself is a gatekeeper. News media decides ‘what’ events to admit through media ‘gates’ on ground of ‘newsworthiness’.

For e.g.: News Comes from various sources, editors choose what should appear and what should not that’s why they are called as gatekeepers.

Priming

Activity of the media in proposing the values and standards by which objects of the media attention can be judged. Media’s content will provide a lot of time and space to certain issues, making it more vivid.

To say in simple words, Media is giving utmost importance to a news so that it gives people the impression that is the most important information. This is done everyday the particular news is carried as a heading or covered everyday for months.

Headlines, Special news features, discussions, expert opinions are used.

Media primes a news by repeating the news and giving it more importance E.g. Nuclear deal.

Framing

Framing is a process of selective control

Two Meanings

  1. Way in which news content is typically shaped and contextualized within same frame of reference.
  2. Audience adopts the frames of reference and to see the world in a similar way. It is how people attach importance to a news and perceive it context within which an issue is viewed.

Framing talks about how people attach importance to certain news for e.g. in case of attack, defeat, win and loss, how the media frames the news such that people perceive it in a different way.

We can take India and Pakistan war; same happening is framed in different ways in both the countries. So depending on which media you view your perception will differ.

Criticisms of Agenda setting theory is

  • Media users not ideal, people may not pay attention to details.
  • Effect is weakened for people who have made up their mind.
  • Media can’t create problems. They can only alter the awareness, Priority etc.

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

nalwoga sharon September 23, 2011 at 8:06 pm

Am requesting for the criticisms of the agenda setting theory as compared in communication theory.

nalwoga sharon September 23, 2011 at 8:10 pm

The criticisms of the agenda setting theory as compared to Maxwell Mccombs.

DONALD March 29, 2012 at 8:30 pm

the importance of agenda setting i full

DONALD March 29, 2012 at 8:31 pm

agenda settings in full

marriam saeed May 19, 2012 at 7:08 pm

short criticisum

laffor peter May 25, 2012 at 6:55 pm

this theory is explained very well

Brown Dauglas November 27, 2012 at 11:29 am

Well explained,but some areas like priming&framing are not clearly exhausted.

Justine July 30, 2013 at 11:55 pm

This has been really helpful in my studying for my final exams this semester!

immaculate December 16, 2013 at 11:00 pm

the relevance of the Agenda Setiing theory to my country Uganda

mahado December 30, 2013 at 8:34 am

thanks a lot this helped me a lot

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: