It is a Circular Model, so that communication is something circular in nature
Encoder – Who does encoding or Sends the message (message originates)
Decoder – Who receives the message
Interpreter – Person trying to understand (analyses, perceive) or interpret
Note: From the message starting to ending, there is an interpretation goes on. Based on this interpretation only the message is received.
This model breaks the sender and receiver model it seems communication in a practical way. It is not a traditional model.
It can happen within our self or two people; each person acts as both sender and receiver and hence use interpretation. It is simultaneously take place e.g. encoding, interpret and decoding.
Semantic noise is a concept introduced here it occurs when sender and receiver apply different meaning to the same message. It happens mostly because of words and phrases for e.g. Technical Language, So certain words and phrases will cause you to deviate from the actual meaning of the communication.
Note: When semantic noise takes place decoding and interpretation becomes difficult and people get deviated from the actual message.
Advantage of Osgood- Schramm model of communication
- Dynamic model- Shows how a situation can change
- It shows why redundancy is an essential part
- There is no separate sender and receiver, sender and receiver is the same person
- Assume communication to be circular in nature
- Feedback – central feature.
Disadvantage of Osgood- Schramm model of communication
This model does not talk about semantic noise and it assume the moment of encoding and decoding.
Should also put conclusions and references if possible
good information but brief ,,, need some more……… but yah good for having concept
What about adding more features of this model of communication?
There s great need for more clarification about semantic noises..
More limitations of the model… thanks for the information
i was looking 4 it
the semantic noises need more light.Good research but do more.Thanks.
you said semantic noise occurs when sender and receiver put different meaning to the same message.How then does the same person contradict his own message and have different meaning 4 same message?
Thanks for all your comments. Btw, with respect to Deng’s comment, Semantic noises occur when the intended message is wrongly conveyed, like, the wrong usage of words or phrases in inappropriate context which might result in giving out some other meaning which is not even intended. Rather, contradictions would be there on a message to be conveyed but its different meanings should be used at the right place in appropriate context and so no semantic noises occur.
Thanks a lot,I actually analyzed the Semantic Noises occurance and i understood it.However you helped explain better.There could be wrong interpretation of the message as it comes back to the sender,creating semantic noises.
Thanks for the summarized notes…..Regards
cite practical example where in the SCHRAMM model of Communication is used practically in everyday life of all members within a society whether local, national or world wide setting that a student, professionals, businessmen, eliterate etc. is involved.
..i reported this model, in our class, and reading this explanation helps me more to understands this modern communication model, as the author said.but the same with the other comments semantic noise here is not discussed broader..it focused only in words…in conversation we must also consider those nonverbal action of a person.
good and to the point
well ithink this model is agood one
Explain sementic noise more…..
this model is good and simple.it gives a reader the clear view of the communication between,people.awesome one1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thats good
Em a student of communication studies, OSGOOD- SCHRAMM MODEL OF COMMUNICATION model presented here in a very good manners a student can easily understand it like me 🙂
thanks admin for the good explanation about semantic noise, it helped me a lot in doing my assignment.. nice one. thank you..
I agree that semantic noise can change way of communication
Can you give concrete exampleS?
And why not try to incorporate it with a movie..
good and well explained
How about semantic noise
am impressed of this resourceful information kudos to whoever analysed it to us
well explained now i got it.
its too brief tjo
well explained, i like it.
its clear when well delivered
Personally, I find it more applicable since the advantages overcome the disadvantages. Thank you for your effort.
Your explanation is upto the mark. however, if possible please add critisism for this model too. Thankyou
It is more easy to understand. The person who sends the message should also be able to interprate. I like it
give examples to clarify it
Nice research, but pls, more explanation on interpreter, field of experience,semantic noise and how a sender is also a receiver……….
give examples plz…
T’s gud in general
I QUOTE YOU; ‘this model breaks the sender and the receiver’ now my question is ‘ how?’
It is so nice but too brif. elaborate more
T`s more than gud;but how the model is relevance in todays life?
it really increased my knowledge ! will help me in attempting my paper tomorrow 😀
well presented,easy to understant,try to include citations.
atleast,add some disadvantages.
atleast, give example for us to know more
In this model you did not talk about the immediate feedback
what a better way you did the explanation,though us juniors in this career it still sound shallow.In Kenya we say bado kidogo maze sijavuta aerial that is -i still havent got home this concept,i wish you did as madam shamsny requested otherwise its on the rail.
That is a wonderful work.give us some examples
news for osgood
communication theory
Really to a greater extent, Aristotle’s model of communication is appreciative in the way that it tries to explain the hindrances that affects communication between two or more people communicating that is to say semantic noise summarized contents,brief,and circulative in nature.Though you need to cite more live examples of which for the applicability of this communication model.Thanks for your contribution….!!!
Aristototle should en light more of his advantages of the model to us